Labour party claims Assad has popular support amongst Syrians
Thornberry claimed that chemical weapons inspector was stopped by UN 'red tape' (AFP)
Britain's shadow foreign secretary, Emily Thornberry, claimed that support for Syrian President Bashar al Assad has been "underestimated" and widespread across Syria.
The comments come in the wake of a series of chemical attacks, opposition activists and rebel groups claim, was perpetrated by the Assad government.
Speaking to Prospect magazine, Thornberry said that Syria needed a "political solution" and called for urgent peace talks between the warring sides.
“There is an argument that if [President Bashar al-Assad] had been as overwhelmingly unpopular as the rebels told the west at the outset then he wouldnt be there,” Thornberry told Prospect Magazine.
“I think there has been depth and a breadth of support for Assad that has been underestimated.”
The author of the Prospect magazine piece had also claimed that Thornberry did not condemn the Syrian government during his interview with her.
A spokesperson for the Labour party said that Thornberry's comments aimed to show that "previous predictions" of Assad's fall "proved over-optimistic."
"It's a statement of fact that in 2011 many commentators and foreign diplomats were predicting that Assad would be deposed in a matter of weeks as the dictators of Tunisia and Egypt," the spokesperson told MEE.
Earlier this year, Thornberry had claimed that Russia was not blocking chemical weapons inspectors from entering Eastern Ghouta after an alleged chemical attack.
During her appearance on BBC's Question Time, she claimed that chemical weapons inspectors were blocked from entering because of "red tape" imposed by the United Nations.
"My understanding is that it's a United Nations with their red tape and their safety an with getting their stuff through. That is what I'm told."
Chlorine gas used in Saraqeb
The Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons also confirmed on Wednesday that chlorine gas was used in an attack in February in Saraqeb, northwestern Idlib.
The OPCW did not say which side used the banned munitions but confirmed that laboratory tests confirmed the presence of chlorine.
The Syrian government denies using chlorine and other chemical weapons.
The OPCW report stated that the government had told it Saraqeb had not been under its control for a long period of time, including the time of the incident.
It supplied the OPCW with technical analysis of the alleged incident based on open-source media but had not responded to further requests for supporting information.